<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smaller Content. Bigger Spread.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/</link>
	<description>The latest in internet strategies and how they can profit your business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Snell</title>
		<link>http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Mark, there is a limit on how small something can be and still have it valuable, you are correct there. I think we are a much better natural judge of something that is too small versus too long, and therefore less susceptible to ruining content by making it too small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, there is a limit on how small something can be and still have it valuable, you are correct there. I think we are a much better natural judge of something that is too small versus too long, and therefore less susceptible to ruining content by making it too small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark - Productivity5</title>
		<link>http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark - Productivity5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnell.com/blog/2008/03/31/smaller-content-bigger-spread/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>I think there is a limit on how effectively you can &quot;chuck&quot; writing.  It seems like it is going to be difficult to distribute something that is really small and still valuable--perhaps jokes, but that is all I can think of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a limit on how effectively you can &#8220;chuck&#8221; writing.  It seems like it is going to be difficult to distribute something that is really small and still valuable&#8211;perhaps jokes, but that is all I can think of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
